EIRP Proceedings, Vol 10 (2015)

An Analysis of the Relationship between Life Expectancy at Birth and the Total Public Revenues in Romania, during 1995-2013



Alina Cristina Nuta1, Florian Marcel Nuta2



Abstract: This paper studies the nature of the relationship and the impact of the demographic phenomena (by life expectancy at birth indicator) on indicators of public finance (through analysis of total government revenue). In this respect, the analysis took into account the evolution of these indicators in Romania in the period 1995-2013 and the conclusions of the empirical analysis revealed positive link between those indicators.

Keywords: ageing; public revenues; life expectancy

JEL Classification: J11; E62; H53



1. Introduction

The phenomenon of the population aging has become one of the most important factors that affect the potential for developing of countries in many ways, generating the need for policy makers to adapt to changing demographics conditions. In this context, many studies examine the major impact on public finances (Auerbach, 2008, Bilan, 2014; Fehr, 2012; Jukka, et all., 2014; Torben, 2012; Zugravu, 2013).

Significant from this perspective are the costs revealed by age-related spending, but we need to remember that the population structure of a country can have repercussions even on the level of public revenues. In this regard, in this paper we analyzed how evolved the total public income in relation with life expectancy at birth, noting that in Romania, during the analyzed period, government revenues increased as a result of the influence generated by longevity.

This result can be explained by the fact that longevity determines an extension of time in which people contribute to public budgets. Also, we can admit that increase government revenue is determined precisely by the need to cover expenses related to age.

However, we must take into account that future developments will not resemble with everyday reality and the pressure on public finances will be extremely intense. Analysis on the sustainability of public finances is justified by the purpose of the governments to finance public services and transfers to the elderly in the future.



2. Data and Methodology

To determine how public finance indicators will be affected by the evolution of age-related variables, we took into account data on total public revenues in the period 1995-2015, as a percentage of GDP, in correspondence with the life expectancy of individuals in Romania, for the same period. The time series were adjusted using logarithm procedures and differentiation (Chirila & Chirila, 2011)



3. Estimating the Relationship between Life Expectancy at Birth and the Level of the Total Public Revenues

3.1. Stationarity

To be stationary, life expectancy variable values were logged and were calculated first difference. For public revenues we have calculated using logarithm procedures.

3.2 Model estimation

Table 1. Model estimation

Dependent Variable: L_GOVREVENUE


Method: Least Squares



Sample (adjusted): 1996 2013



Included observations: 18 after adjustments












Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.  











C

3.475084

0.011573

300.2825

0.0000

DL_LIFEEXPECTB

3.965792

1.756611

2.257638

0.0383











R-squared

0.241596

    Mean dependent var

3.491078

Adjusted R-squared

0.194196

    S.D. dependent var

0.043249

S.E. of regression

0.038824

    Akaike info criterion

-3.555139

Sum squared resid

0.024116

    Schwarz criterion

-3.456208

Log likelihood

33.99625

    Hannan-Quinn criter.

-3.541497

F-statistic

5.096931

    Durbin-Watson stat

1.315360

Prob(F-statistic)

0.038298














Source: own calculation

The model is: L_GOVREVENUE = 3.475 +3.965 DL_LIFEEXPECTB

The probabilities associated with the t test (to test the significance of the regression model parameters) are smaller than 0.05, so are the parameters of the regression model are statistically significant. The model shows that government total revenues depend on DL_LIFEEXPECTB . The relationship between variables is strong, DL_LIFEEXPECTB explain a proportion of 24.16 of L_GOVREVENUE



3.3. Hypothesis Testing

* Testing the lack of autocorrelation of errors

Table 2. Errors correlogram

Sample: 1996 2013






Included observations: 18



















Autocorrelation

Partial Correlation


AC 

 PAC

 Q-Stat

 Prob















     . |**. |

     . |**. |

1

0.249

0.249

1.3180

0.251

     . | . |

     . *| . |

2

-0.038

-0.107

1.3513

0.509

     .**| . |

     .**| . |

3

-0.283

-0.265

3.2745

0.351

     . *| . |

     . | . |

4

-0.176

-0.047

4.0696

0.397

     . |* . |

     . |* . |

5

0.088

0.141

4.2851

0.509

     . |* . |

     . | . |

6

0.164

0.040

5.0913

0.532

     . |* . |

     . | . |

7

0.114

0.006

5.5162

0.597

     . |* . |

     . |* . |

8

0.152

0.201

6.3468

0.608

     . *| . |

     . *| . |

9

-0.130

-0.155

7.0203

0.635

     .**| . |

     .**| . |

10

-0.292

-0.253

10.845

0.370

     . *| . |

     . | . |

11

-0.151

0.053

12.022

0.362

     . | . |

     . | . |

12

-0.019

-0.022

12.045

0.442















Source: own calculation

Since all probabilities associated with Ljung-Box test (Q state) are greater than 0.05 (risk assumed) the estimated model errors are auto correlated.

*Testing the errors homoscedasticity

Table 3. Correlogram of squared errors

Sample: 1996 2013






Included observations: 18



















Autocorrelation

Partial Correlation


AC 

 PAC

 Q-Stat

 Prob















     . |**. |

     . |**. |

1

0.283

0.283

1.6981

0.193

     . |* . |

     . | . |

2

0.078

-0.002

1.8350

0.400

     . *| . |

     . *| . |

3

-0.163

-0.201

2.4740

0.480

     .**| . |

     .**| . |

4

-0.281

-0.207

4.5070

0.342

     . | . |

     . |* . |

5

-0.029

0.141

4.5302

0.476

     .**| . |

     .**| . |

6

-0.222

-0.285

6.0143

0.422

     . *| . |

     . *| . |

7

-0.172

-0.168

6.9773

0.431

     . *| . |

     . *| . |

8

-0.160

-0.104

7.8945

0.444

     . *| . |

     . *| . |

9

-0.103

-0.074

8.3224

0.502

     . |* . |

     . |* . |

10

0.191

0.088

9.9560

0.444

     . |**. |

     . |**. |

11

0.319

0.228

15.187

0.174

     . |* . |

     .**| . |

12

0.097

-0.227

15.746

0.203








Source: Own calculation

Since all probabilities associated Ljung-Box test (Q state) applied squared errors are greater than 0.05 (risk assumed) the estimated model errors are homoscedastic.

Figure 1. The distribution of the estimated error of the regression model

Since the probability associated Jarque-Bera test is greater than 0.05 errors follow a normal distribution law.



4. Conclusion

Therefore, the regression model assumptions are met. Thus, in the analyzed period, in Romania public revenues depend on the life expectancy. We finds that there is a positive relationship between these two parameters, which leads to the conclusion that public revenues increased as life expectancy at birth has increased. This conclusion leads us to the idea that in the analyzed period total public revenues increased because of the longer life of the taxpayer, which is consistent with other research findings in.



5. Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the European Social Fund through Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007 – 2013, project number POSDRU/159/1.5/S/142115, project title “Performance and Excellence in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Research in Economic Sciences Domain in Romania”.



6. References

Auerbach, A.J. (2008). Long-term objectives for public debt. Report 2008-1. Swedish Fiscal Policy Council.

Bilan, I., Roman ,A. (2014). Interest payments on public debt and thequality of public finances. “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Vol. XIV, Issue 2, pp. 429-435.

Chirila, V. & Chirila, C. (2011). Empirical characteristics of the business cycles in the central and east european countries. Journal of International Scientific Publication: Ecology and Safety, Volume 4.

Fehr, H., Jokisch, S., Kotlikoff, L. (2013). The world’s interconnected demographic/fiscal transition. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing 1-2, pp. 35–49.

Jukka, L, Tarmo, V, Juha, M. A, (2014). Demographic forecasts and fiscal policy rules. International Journal of Forecasting 30, pp. 1098–1109.

McKissack, A., Cornley, B., (2005). Fiscal sustainability and pre-funding strategies in OECD countries. Working paper.

Shelton, C. (2008). The aging population and the size of the welfare state: Is there a puzzle? Journal of Public Economics, 92 pp. 647–651.

Torben, M. Andersen (2012). Fiscal sustainability and demographics – Should we save or work more? Journal of Macroeconomics 34, pp. 264–280.

Zugravu, B.G. (2013). Politici financiare publice/Public fnacial policies. Bucharest: Tritonic Books.

1Senior Lecturer, PhD, “Danubius” University of Galati, Romania, Address: 3 Galati Boulevard, 800654 Galati, Romania, Tel.: +40.372.361.102, fax: +40.372.361.290, E-mail: alinanuta@univ-danubius.ro.

2 Senior Lecturer, PhD, PhD, “Danubius” University of Galati, Romania, Address: 3 Galati Boulevard, 800654 Galati, Romania, Tel.: +40.372.361.102, fax: +40.372.361.290, Corresponding author: floriann@univ-danubius.ro.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.